DynaNail TTC

The DynaNail® Difference

#NailItTheFirstTime

Explore the difference in the innovative DynaNail TTC Fusion System, engineered to redefine TTC fusion constructs. Backed by robust clinical evidence, this dynamic system provides superior fusion rates1,2,3 and faster recoveries4. With DynaNail® TTC, your patients can rely on a solution that has over a decade of clinical success and 40+ published studies behind it.

 Learn More  Contact Us 

90%

Overall fusion rate of Dynanail® vs. 65% in competitive nails1,2,3

40+

Pieces of published & peer-reviewed data around Dynanail®

36%

Faster time to fusion with DynaNail® vs. Competitive Nails4

1/2
“The DynaNail® is an unrivaled orthopedic device and my implant of choice for hindfoot arthrodesis. No other hindfoot fusion device allows for intra-operative compression and accounts for post-operative bone resorption by maintaining active compression. It’s amazing to ‘see’ the DynaNail at work!”
Dr. Samuel Adams, MD (Durham, NC)
2/2
“After nearly 12 years of experience using DynaNail, I can literally say that we have been able to heal and save many limbs that have been deemed unsalvageable with the active, adaptive healing that is present with the sustained dynamic compression of the NiTiNOL element. The device is able to reach Clinical Osteogenic/Osteoinductive compressive loads in fusion sites without creating compression necrosis or stress shielding the bone. The clinical data supports this device for all my fusions and especially the difficult salvage cases.”
– Dr. Douglas Pacaccio, Design Surgeon (Sycamore, IL)

Curious about discovering the capabilities of DynaNail TTC? Reach out to us!

 

Stay connected with us on Instagram and LinkedIn

#NailItTheFirstTime

 
faa-insta-01.jpg
faa-insta-04.jpg
faa-insta-05.jpg
faa-insta-06.jpg
faa-insta-07.jpg
  1. Kreulen C, Giza E, Natsuhara K, Ip W. Dynamic Nitinol Compression Versus Static Compression in Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail Fusion, presented at the 2022 Western Orthopaedic Association Annual Meeting; Maui, HI.
  2. Griffin MJ, Coughlin MJ. Evaluation of Midterm Results of the Panta Nail: An Active Compression Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Device. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 57,1 (2018): 74-80. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2017.08.010.
  3. Ellington K, Ford S, Kwon J. Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Utilizing a Titanium Intramedullary Nail with an Internal Pseudoelastic NiTiNOL Compression Element: A Retrospective Case Series of 33 Patients. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 2019; 58(2):266-272. doi:10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.046.
  4. Steele, JR et al. Comparison of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodeses Using a Sustained Dynamic Compression Nail Versus Nondynamized Nails. Foot & ankle specialist vol. 13,3 (2020): 193-200. doi:10.1177/1938640019843332.

MK-10551